Agatha Christie Ltd keeps a tight control over its trademarks. In Australia alone it currently has 10 trademarks registered with IP Australia, and it renews those regularly. Here’s a list of all of them and when they’re next due for renewal.
Trademark | Renewal due |
---|---|
Miss Marple | 22 Jul 2025 |
Murder On The Orient Express | 4 Jul 2027 |
Marple | 4 Jul 2027 |
Death On The Nile | 4 Apr 2028 |
Witness For The Prosecution | 5 Apr 2028 |
Poirot | 22 Nov 2030 |
Miss Marple | 31 May 2033 |
And Then There Were None | 31 May 2033 |
Agatha Christie | 31 May 2033 |
Agatha Christie (signature) | 31 May 2033 |
Observant readers will note “Miss Marple” appears twice. All these registrations cover three classes of goods: 9, 16 and 41 (which broadly include books, movies, TV shows, stationery, computer games, education and a few other categories). The Miss Marple that falls due in 2025 only covers class 16, but includes a longer list of subcategories than the broader registration, which essentially only covers stationery. Looks like someone didn’t put in a detailed enough list the first time around.
But that’s not the biggest evident glitch. One trademark has actually been allowed to expire: the somewhat lengthy Agatha Christie The Poirot Collection. This was registered in January 2007, but the renewal was not paid for in 2017.

At first glance I thought this might have been a deliberate decision not to renew, since the branding was used for a DVD series, and DVD sales have been declining rapidly in recent years.
However, on checking the parallel UK trademarks registry, the trademark has been renewed there, and next falls due on 27 September 2025. So the Australian lapse looks like an error rather than a strategic move.
Does this mean anyone can run wild now and use the label “Agatha Christie The Poirot Collection” in Australia? Doubtful.
The company still holds the trademarks for Christie’s name and for Poirot, and it keeps producing new Poirot adaptations. So while pre-1928 Christie titles are now in the public domain in the US and freely reprinted, I don’t think we’ll see that label used for any collections of them.
Leave a Reply